Five Cents Ten Cents

Financial freedom, one realistic step at a time.

CPF Life Schemes: Your Choice for Life


Elderly woman hands up - Issan, Thailand

Elderly woman hands up - Issan, Thailand

The Government announced the CPF Life scheme sometime last year with mixed responses. What the CPF Life scheme does is to lock up part of  your CPF minimum sum away to fund an annuity, upon which the payouts from age 82 or 85 (depending on your draw down age) and above would come from this annuity.

Under the old CPF scheme, your CPF minimum sum would fund your retirement for 20 years from the draw-down age. But if you out-live that time and have no-other sources of retirement income or savings, then you would be a burden to society.

The CPF Life scheme was meant to address that issue by forcing you to buy an annuity whether you like it or not to fund the remaining years of your retirement living.

CPF Life: What you need to know

This post is not going to debate the advantages and disadvantages of the scheme, because for the majority of us, we have no choice as it is an auto opt-in scheme (without any option to opt out) if you reach 55 by 2013 with at least $40,000 in your CPF retirement account.

So for many of us who will be 55 by 2013, we are given 4 choices for the CPF Life plan, reduced from the previous 12 which is deemed to be confusing for us.

The new CPF Life Scheme really presents yourself with 2 decisions to make:

1) Do you want to leave any of the refundable annuity portion to your beneficiary?

2) How much do we want to do so for (1)?

Leaving nothing to the next generation

Once you decide, you don’t want to leave anything to your beneficiaries, then you only have 1 choice, i.e. to choose CPF Life Income plan which provides for the highest monthly payouts of the 4 plans at $640-$700 per month (assuming 3.75% to 4.25% interest rate and 1% extra interest is paid on first $60,000 of SMRA account balances with half minimum sum of $67,000).

The downside of this option is that should one pass early, then the entire minimum sum goes into the central pool to fund other people’s retirements. So you are taking a risk that if you do not outlive the payouts, you could potentially be donating your minimum sum to the Gahmen who at this point in time didn’t state if they will send you a nice bunch of flowers for doing so.

Leaving something to the next generation

Once you decide to leave something to your next generation, you then have to decide if you want to leave MORE or LESS for them. This is because the more payouts you want for your living expenses, the lesser the refundable portion of the annuity will come back to you. Essentially if you prefer to have higher payouts and leave less for your next generation, then you can consider CPF Life Plus. If you prefer to leave more for your next generation and can live on less payouts, then opt for CPF Life Basic plan.

My thinking now is I’ll probably chose CPF Life Basic as I intend to maximise the amount I leave to my beneficiaries and not the Gahmen. I plan to have retirement income sources beyond my CPF savings so leaving more to my beneficiaries is an important factor.

Leong Sze Hian warned about taking the CPF Life Income plan because of the risk of losing all your CPF minimum sum should you pass away earlier. The payout difference of $100+ per month doesn’t seem to warrant taking such risks.

Which CPF Life Plan would you choose and why?

Tell Panzer in the comment section! :-)

Be well and prosper.

»crosslinked«

  • Everlearning says:

    When the time comes, I will opt for CPF Life Basic, the very reason you gave.

    As for those who have no posterity, they seem to loose out the most. Life is so unpredictable and it should not be based on statistic findings on Longevity. Sometimes, I wonder since when our caring Government elites have taken such great pains to see me financially secured till old age.

    24/02/2009 at 9:04 am
  • panzer says:

    Hi Everlearning

    Yes, for those who have no beneficiaries to leave their CPF monies, they will not be able to make use of the CPF minimum sum for old age if they pass on not soon after hitting the draw down age of 62 or 65.

    The reality is that gahmen locks up our own monies and yet claims that this is in the citizen’s best interest. It may be for those who are not responsible with money and will spend all their life savings at one go but for the majority who can think and will make their money stretch, it’s one less choice over what to do with our own monies.

    Be well and prosper.

    24/02/2009 at 9:29 am
  • Ferrero says:

    My first choice will be to give up my citizenship and get all my CPF $$ out and retire somewhere else…

    Of coz if i have to choose between the 3, i go for CPF Life Plus.
    I will ask my children not to give me allowance to free them of some financial burden and live on the CPF Life Plus payouts till the day i am called home to heaven.

    24/02/2009 at 9:47 am
  • Panzer says:

    Hi Ferrero

    Emigrating is a big decision and it’s sad to leave your country of birth especially for those of us who spend 2.5 years + 10 years of annual ICT defending it.

    Why should I get out of my own country?

    I share your sentiment that we should leave less financial burden on our children.

    Be well and prosper!

    Panzer’s last blog post..OCBC Monthly Savings Account

    24/02/2009 at 2:25 pm
  • Bo Zheng Hu says:

    Hmmmm decisions decisions decisions…either Life Plus or Basic, depending on whether my future kids would want to send moi to the retirement villages in JB by then. If they want to box me up and ship me out, as little money for the ingrates as possible! LOL

    24/02/2009 at 6:34 pm
  • Panzer says:

    Hi Bo Zheng Hu

    Yep, I just hope my child will still visit me when I’m shipped to JB after spending 2.5 years + 10 years reservist defending the country. :-)

    27/02/2009 at 9:03 pm
  • KNN Tio Pian Liao says:

    Correct me…there is no where in the publicity articles of CPF that explain at what age when one dies will the balance be made available. I thought I read somewhere that the cut-off age is 70. I.e., if one dies before 70 and his plan calls for bequeathing the balance, yes, the balance will be given to the his family, but if he dies after the cut-off age, whatever plan he chooses, there will be no balance amount for his family. Anyone care to confirm?

    06/09/2009 at 9:32 pm

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

CommentLuv badge